Lincolnite

Two notes about advertisements in the Nebraska governor's race:

• Tom Osborne has a new radio ad campaign going right now. One of the ads asks, "How often have you had the chance to vote for someone you felt like you really knew, someone you watched for more than 30 years?" I told myself early on that if Osborne pandered to Husker fans with shameless "vote for me because I was a good coach" pleas he'd get knocked down a few notches in my book. Consider him knocked down.
• I heard a Dave Heineman ad on Z-92 this morning. It was the (or a) "Good for Dave Heineman" ad. Whoever is responsible for that thing should be kicked in the shins. Does the Heineman campaign really expect anybody to take that ad seriously? I've heard parodies that weren't that tacky.

In other news, I caught just a couple minutes of David Kramer on Z-92. He probably made some friends (or at least soothed some enemies) with his appearance. The guy sounded pretty good on the radio. Very senatorial.

This isn't directly a Lincoln issue, but I'm putting it here anyway. Nebraskans enjoy complaining about taxes, and a common complaint is that Nebraskans pay more in taxes than do residents in other states. The Census says that's only half right: Nebraska is 24th in per capita taxes, at $2,158.36. In other words, we're not too far from average. Whether or not we get a decent bang for our buck is a whooooole other issue.

The Lincoln Fire Department needs help because many of its promises failed to materialize after it took over ambulance service in 2001.

The city-run ambulance service lost nearly half a million dollars last year, owes about $1.5 million to the city and has requested a $250,000 city subsidy this year. The ambulance service has been run by the Lincoln Fire Department since 2001, after voters were convinced [the fire department] could deliver the service faster, better and cheaper.

Did you hear that deafening roar just now? That was the plan's critics hollering a simultaneous "I told you so!"

Gas prices have been creeping upwards over the past week or so. I'm pegging the peak price of the cheap stuff this summer at $3.75. Anybody else care to take a guess?

Congratulations to all of the participants in The Link, Lincoln's first (hopefully annual) urban adventure race. I really wanted to participate, but with all of the soccer I've been reffing this spring, there just wasn't any time to do any bike training. (That, and my bike is a mess right now.) I would love to hear from any participants. How was the race?

I took a quick gander at the garden this morning. Looks like it is already springing to life. Unfortunately, most of the life is weeds trying to convince me to nurture them, rather than tasty chiles and zucchini, this summer. Yeah right. But my sage is back with gusto, and my rosemary is starting to come back to life. I got a big surprise this morning when I noticed that my cilantro is already popping up. Strange, since last year's plant spent most of last year on death's doorstep. Also odd since I only had one plant last year, but this year I have five plants eager to start the season. Oh well, I'm not one to complain about enthuastic food in the garden. Maybe it's a good sign.

I know this is a bit juvenile, but it's Friday, so get over it. I was looking for the KPMG convention center study on the City of Lincoln website so that I could read the report over lunch. (I still haven't found it. Anybody got a copy?) While I browsed around, I stopped by Mayor Colleen Seng's website. On her site she lists her accomplishments. The page is blank.

Love 'em or hate 'em, impact fees are here to stay.

Will LB500 (PDF) send Lincoln off to the races to plan and construct a new arena and convention center in the Haymarket? That's the question raised in a Journal Star article today. LB500 gives communities two years after the bill's passage to take advantage of the bill's provisions, and three years after that to build and open the facility. 2011 sounds like it's still a long ways off, and it is, but if Lincoln wants to hit that deadline, it'll need to get moving. I like that LB500 may push Lincoln to make some decisions about a Pershing Center replacement. At some point we need to stop fantasizing and start doing. But that's where my enthusiasm for LB500 ends. First and foremost LB500 encourages Lincoln to assume that an arena and convention center is the best way to address Lincoln's needs. That's an assumption that many Lincolnites have been making for years, and I think it's a bad assumption to hold. There are alternatives to building a carbon copy of Qwest Center Omaha, but those alternatives have been absent from public discussion. It is easy to think that Qwest2 is Lincoln's best bet when it is presented as our only option. That single-mindedness is supported by LB500's tight timelines. The bill's 2+3 year schedule doesn't allow enough time to think about all of the other ways Lincoln could support local economic development and attract investment and visitors. Nor does it allow for sufficient time for the community to have other serious and necessary conversations, on questions like: Should this be a public, public/private, or private project? and What taxes are the best for funding this sort of project, or should taxes be used at all? and How much are we, as a community, willing to pay for this thing over the years? Lincoln came through pretty well on the Haymarket Park deal, so there is reason to think that the City can make this project work. On the other hand, the Antelope Valley Project, although moving along, has been marred by hiccups and funding woes (and ballooning cost estimates), and the city-supported project that ultimately became The Grand was mostly a pipe dream. Whatever happens, my main concern is that Lincolnites participate in the upcoming discussions, both formally (at public meetings) and informally (at the water cooler). The scope of the discussion so far seems to have been "Pershing sucks. A new place sure would be cool. But taxes suck." It hasn't been an especially broad or deep conversation, in other words. Surely we can do better on such an important topic.

The Missus and I ended up eating at Crawdaddy's last night. The Missus had her usual crawfish pie, while I deviated from my norm (the Ultimate Big Ass Burrito with mofo salsa) and went with the cajun combo plate. Everything was tasty as usual, and after using our Pogo card it was pretty darn cheap, too. Of course, The Missus and I can't eat in the Haymarket without stopping by Ivanna Cone. I went with a caramel shake (*drool*). Just to be different we decided to take a dish of dutch chocolate over to the server at Crawdaddy's. She had mentioned during our meal that dutch chocolate was her favorite and, well, what can I say, it felt like one of those "pay it forward" moments. And besides, what's a better tip than Ivanna Cone ice cream?

When I first saw the story that three of Lincoln's lottery winners donated some of their winnings to folks at the People's City Mission ($2,000 from each of the winners), the first thing I thought was, "Gee, how long until the 'Is that all?!' crowd shows up?" Sure enough, the second comment on the Journal Star's website didn't disappoint:

I think there [sic] pretty pathetic they have millions of dollars and they each give out 2 grand.

*sigh* So predictable. First it was all "Congratulations!" and "Good for them!" and "Way to go, blue collar people!". Now it's "How dare they spend their money that way!". It's a shame the winners have to hear that since not one among us has the moral authority to criticize them. For the record, the winners have already collectively given some $50 million to folks begging for handouts. I'd say that was pretty darn generous, and I thank them for it.

Tonight is Date Night, but I can't think of a good place to go eat. I'm hungry from all the reffing I've been doing, but it's a generic hunger, not anything specific to a particular dish or theme. I've thought of a few possibilities:

• Grandmother's: a plate of Super Nachos sounds tasty, and we haven't been there in a while.
• Stauffer's: I still can't believe we've lived within blocks of this place for 2 years and we've never eaten there. I guess I'm still bitter that Julio's closed (a decade ago!)
• Crawdaddy's: doesn't a Big Ass Burrito sound tasty? And its proximity to Ivanna Cone means I can leave the Haymarket absolutely stuffed.
• Outback: it's been ages since we've been there, and I feel like supporting construction-affected businesses around 48th and O.
• Something Italian. I had an awesome meal (Spiedino di Mare) at Carrabba's Italian Grill up in Omaha last fall, but I'm not going to drive up there tonight. Hey Carrabba's, Lincoln wants you!

Anybody have any suggestions? Are there any great new places that I may have missed?

Looks like Mr. T exposed himself this morning in the letters to the editor section of the Lincoln Journal Star (last letter):

...A note to my fellow Lincolnites: Beware of the city criminalizing you through obscure parking laws in order to obtain revenue. I just fell victim to this when my car was ticketed twice for violating a 24-hour parking law I had never heard of while I was out of town on vacation. Upon returning, the city attorney’s office informed me this law was “common knowledge” and, despite my need to use on-street parking at my apartment, the city’s law required me to move my car from one side of the street to the other or around the corner ever 24 hours. Of all the ludicrous laws! How is an honest, law-abiding citizen to keep up with them all? I hope sharing my $20 tough-luck lesson will help others avoid breaking the law unwittingly and being taken in by Lincoln’s underhanded means of procuring revenue. Christa Kinsley, Lincoln

Hmph. You might've thought Mr. T's name would have started with, y'know, a T. Oh well, this sounds so much like Mr. T it has to be him. Anyway, in Mr. T's Miss Kinsley's defense, the 24-hour law is pretty harsh. As hard as it is for the auto-dependent among us to believe, some people actually don't need their cars for days or weeks at a time. Forcing those folks to move their cars every day seems awfully silly. On the other hand, the city needs some way to identify abandoned or trouble cars, and the city's streets shouldn't be used for long-term storage. So how can we approach a win-win on this? I have two top-of-the-head ideas. First (and most obviously) we need to extend the length of time vehicles can be parked on-street. I think I can make a solid argument for anywhere from 36 to 72 hours. The police won't like the longer time span because it will complicate their job a bit, but the law should be designed not for the enforcers, but for those it is enforced upon. Areas for which the 24-hour restriction still makes sense can and should remain 24 hours, but there will need to be a clear and obvious reason for that limit to remain in effect, and the shorter time limit should be made clear with signage. My second idea is some sort of "I live in this neighborhood and I need a car but I don't drive every day so quit harassing me" permit. For an annual fee, persons who can prove their residence in an area would be given a sticker (a window decal, most likely) that would permit them to park on the street for longer than usual. The fee should cover only the cost of the program; it should not be a revenue-generator. Vehicles would have to be parked within two linear blocks of the residence to which they belong. I'm not crazy about creating more red tape but, well, it's just an idea. Anybody have any other ideas? Or is anybody brave enough to face Mr. T's wrath and defend the status quo?

The time and date are now 01:02:03 04/05/06. That is all.