Joseph W. Johnson, Jr. asks if the City and Douglas Theaters are too cozy in this morning's LJS
letters to the editor:
Am I the only citizen who wonders what is wrong with the picture of enduring alliances among former Mayor Don Wesely, current Mayor Coleen Seng and Douglas Theatres?
Now we read that after the a Wesely/Seng-orchestrated, financially disastrous switch from private ambulance service to Lincoln Fire Department service, and after the eminent domain creation of The Grand, owned (through tax increment financing) and operated by Douglas (as is every other screen in Lincoln), Seng now supports a high-rise and civic center proposal which — how amazingly — buys Douglas Theatre’s now nearly worthless properties downtown for millions of dollars.
Am I the only one who is concerned?
It's easy enough to blow aside Mr. Johnson's concerns because of how he has chosen to write his letter. For example the Fire Department slam is awfully disingenuous in this context. But the overall question that concerns Mr. Johnson, snarkiness aside, is a reasonable one.
To begin, I pin The Grand more on the City and the Downtown Lincoln Association than on Douglas. Douglas just took advantage of what was presented to them. One can hardly blame them. And to be fair, the City's
first plan for the block that The Grand now sits on was in fact much more grand, and much less Douglas-centric.
It is also unfair to blame the Douglas 3 building sale on some sort of City/Douglas conspiracy. It's a bad building in a prime spot, a nasty combination if our goal is to revitalize Downtown. Combine that with the City's longtime goal of establishing a Downtown park, and a consultant's recommendation that the site would make a great location for such a park, and you've got the buyout we see today. It really isn't surprising or conspiratorial.
That brings us to the purchase of the Star Ship 9. The SS9 situation is a little stranger, primarily because I don't understand Douglas' motivation for selling the property so easiliiy. By most indications the SS9 is reasonably popular with the public and it does a fair amount of business. Perhaps "a fair amount" just isn't good enough to keep the theater afloat in the contemporary media entertainment climate. Or perhaps Douglas wants the cash to put toward another project they have their eyes on. In any event I don't immediately sense a conflict of interest.
In summary, then, I think Mr. Johnson is overreacting in the context he has presented. I think it is proper for Lincolnites to raise an eyebrow or two, but I don't see any shenanigans. I
do have a problem with Douglas' de facto monopoly status, but that's a slightly different issue, and one which Mr. Johnson didn't raise.