You Want to Put WHAT in a Floodplain? That’s Insane!
By: Mr. Wilson on
November 13, 2007
I'm not nearly as opposed to the proposal to build housing for mentally ill residents in the Salt Creek floodplain as many others seem to be. Population that needs housing + a place for that housing = sounds good to me.
Ok ok, it's not that simple. But why shouldn't it be? The main complaint seems to be that the housing will flood. Well, yeah, it is in a floodplain after all. But aren't there very simple methods to prevent that? Like bringing in dirt and building up the area under the homes? If there's a flood, they'll have their own private island for a while. That doesn't seem so bad.
And even if the houses to flood, it's not like folks with mental illnesses are stupid. They'll just evacuate. Or go upstairs. Of course, if they aren't bringing in dirt, why the heck are they proposing to build there? Because somebody in the flood insurance business has a vote on the City Council?
Unfortunately the news I've seen and heard about the proposal doesn't mention raising the area five feet. I haven't seen any reference to extra dirt at all. If it's true that the plan is just to build in the floodplain and roll the dice, that sounds risky. I think others have already tried that experiment. Early results from the lab haven't looked good.