That’s a Tasty Bullfrog

By: Mr. Wilson on April 28, 2007
After a tiring morning of soccer matches, my dad and I had lunch at Mexicali Bullfrog. Why aren't more Lincolnites talking about this place? Location is probably one of the reasons. Tucked into a strip mall on the southwest corner of 70th and O, Mexicali Bullfrog isn't exactly visible. Nor is it very large. There's one table (3 chairs), one counter (3 stools), and one spool (3 seats). Yes, I said spool, as in college student living room. The interior is nicely decorated with a bit of a rainforest feel. My dad and I both had the Poison Dart Burrito, a large spinach tortilla filled with chicken, ground beef, lettuce, and salsa. I really enjoyed my burrito, and I think my dad probably would have enjoyed his more if it hadn't fallen apart on him. A piece of advice: keep the burrito wrapped up in the wax paper as long as possible to help prevent the problem my dad experienced. Also on the menu are tacos, enchiladas and a couple other Mexican-inspired favorites. Overall I was pleased with the experience, and I plan to go back. Given the choice between the nearby Taco Inn (our original destination) and Mexicali Bullfrog, I'll take the latter every time. It's hard not to make comparisons with Paul's BBQ (48th and Pioneers) because both restaurants began out of the back of a truck. I didn't discover either one until they had their permanent locations, and I think both have the potential to do well.

Friday Five

By: Mr. Wilson on April 27, 2007
I recently stumbled across this quiz. It just happens to have five questions, so they make an excellent Friday Five:
  1. What year was the City of Lincoln founded?
  2. What was the 2002 population of Lincoln?
  3. How big is Lincoln in square miles?
  4. How many acres of parks and miles of trails are in our City?
  5. How many Mayors has Lincoln had, and how many have been women?
Bonus points if you can tell me where I found the quiz. (But if you find it, please don't post all the answers until others have taken a shot.)

Time Warner “Holds Back”

By: Mr. Wilson on April 27, 2007
One of the Journal Star's headlines in this morning's paper, "Time Warner holds back information from advisory board", seems designed to elicit a particularly negative response from readers. But to me, the information that Time Warner declined to provide isn't very shocking. The company answered "unknown" to questions about how many customers had or are having problems, and how customers have been compensated for their problems. Regarding the latter, the company said the information is "confidential and competitively sensitive". That makes sense to me. That's not to say that I am defending Time Warner for providing a defective product. But put yourself in their shoes: would you willingly release information about your company that could be used by competitors to harm you? I sure as heck wouldn't. Nothing short of a court order would get me to release that information. Without seeing all of the questions posed and Time Warner's answers, it's impossible to know just how cooperative Time Warner was overall. The Journal Star doesn't offer any information one way ("the remainder of the company's answers were complete and informative") or the other ("most of the company's responses were short with minimal information"). If they were obstinate all the way around, well, heck with 'em. If, on the other hand, they offered 57 generally helpful responses and refused to answer just these 3 questions, I have a hard time getting worked up.

Back and Body

By: Mr. Wilson on April 27, 2007
Ever since I was a kid, it has always struck me as cool when I find out that big national (or international) products are made right here in Lincoln. Excedrin Back and Body to the list. Considering how much yard work I may be doing this summer (if all of our earth-moving and fence-building plans come to fruition), I will definitely keep that product in mind.

9 South Chargrill Opens Next Week

By: Mr. Wilson on April 26, 2007
9 South Chargrill, at 9th and South, will "soft" open next Friday. "The menu will run the gamut from burgers and steaks to duck and veal." Duck and veal? Sounds like an odd menu choice for that location, but hey, I'm intrigued. Maybe owner Brett Richardson will add venison to the menu someday. Mmmm.

Stop Picking on Ricky Turco

By: Mr. Wilson on April 26, 2007
Naomi Turco, Ricky Turco's wife, wants Lincolnites to stop picking on him:
Ricky Turco and I would like it if people would leave us alone. Ricky has gotten many death threats since the night of the accident. People destroyed our nonworking 1988 Chevy Camaro, broke windows in our house and sent hate and rude letters in the mail. Many people are talking bad about him in the paper and on the news. Everyone that is doing this needs to stop because you don't know him. He feels bad about what happened to Megan Churchill and to the other passengers that were in the car at that time. He knows that what he did was stupid. The reason I know all of this about him is because I'm his wife, and I've lived with all of this every day. Everyone will do something stupid once in their life. Ricky has remorse and sadness about all of this, he does show it, it's just no one sees it or wants to. We are very angry with the paper at this time, because they wrote three articles about Ricky with our address. What is everyone going to say or do when he gets out of jail if he ends up going? Naomi R. Turco, Lincoln
Ms. Turco is correct about two things: the death threats, property destruction, and other shenanigans need to stop; and her husband is stupid. Ricky Turco is stupid because by driving dangerously he killed a young woman. Then he had the cojones to claim he "technically ... didn't kill anybody", and he followed that up by driving illegally just days later. I may not know your husband personally, Ms. Turco, but I know stupidity when I see it. [Edited 2007-04-26 14:30 to add: Ricky Turco's attorney agrees.]

The T is for Terrorist

By: Mr. Wilson on April 25, 2007
Mr. T just called. He has been trying to get back to Lincoln for over a day now after a trip back east. Last night he ended up in Chicago, and today he is stuck in Denver. But he isn't just stuck in the "our plane hasn't taken off yet" sense. That wouldn't be worth a blog post. No, Mr. T and his fellow passengers are on a bus bound for who-knows-where that is being escorted by two SUV's of the sort that you always see the Feds driving in movies. Apparently something tripped the TSA's alarms and now Mr. T is seeing our "Homeland Security" folks in action. (Mr. T isn't impressed so far.) I can't wait for Mr. T to get back so he can tell us the full story. That is, of course, unless all the passengers are on their way to Guantanamo. If that's the case: T, can I have your new computer?

Up, Up and Away!

By: Mr. Wilson on April 25, 2007
Given the choice between big and huge, Mayor Colleen Seng opted for huge by selecting Lincoln Synergy Group's 22-story tower for the Catalyst One project at 14th & Q. Dial Realty's smaller 13-story plan was not selected; developer John Q. Hammons withdrew his non-proposal early in the process. Lincolnites should be both excited by and wary of this proposal. On the one hand, this is a huge development for Downtown and the economic impact is not likely to be negligible. On the other hand, in the past we have been offered grandiose visions of the future. Some of those visions worked out, some went off with a fizzle rather than a bang, and some never happened at all. But don't fall back to cynicism where only a healthy dose of caution is needed. Even a project half as grand wouldn't be half bad. The next few months of negotiations and emerging details will be very interesting to watch. Cross your fingers folks, and hopefully a few years from now we'll be cutting the ribbon on a new addition to Lincoln's skyline.

Walkabout

By: Mr. Wilson on April 25, 2007
After a rough evening Monday night, Robbie and I had a great boys night yesterday. While The Missus was away, we got all sorts of playing in. Most fun for dad was watching Robbie really try to walk from A to B rather than always dropping to the floor and crawling. It was also a hoot seeing how much Robbie thrives on praise. His face lights up when he knows he is going to receive applause or a big hug. (Think he'll still do that when he's 16?) I can hardly believe he'll already be one year next month. Time flies!

Dark and Moist

By: Mr. Wilson on April 25, 2007
Normally I reserve those adjectives for chocolate cake, but lately they are very appropriate for the weather we've been having. I certainly welcome the rain, but the darkness gets a little old. Did everybody remember to clear out their gutters before the spring rains?

Open Window Policy

By: Mr. Wilson on April 25, 2007
Paul William Smith wants an open-able window policy at LPS. Apparently LPS plans to install windows that don't open in its new and remodeled schools. Smith thinks that the unlikely but nonzero chance that students may need to jump out the windows in the event of an emergency is enough reason to require windows that open. What do you think? Should LPS change course? Or do other concerns outweigh those expressed by Smith?

A Long Cry

By: Mr. Wilson on April 24, 2007
I think Robert may have broken a record last night. He cried for a good hour and twenty minutes. We tried various techniques to figure out what was wrong/get him to stop crying, but nothing seemed to help. Finally I just plopped down on the couch with him and we watched Family Guy together. Apparently he finds Family Guy boring because he was out within five minutes. I let him lay on my chest for ten or fifteen more minutes, and then I put him to bed. I hate (seemingly) random crying. It can really make a guy feel like a crappy parent. That usually isn't true, of course. Sometimes babies cry for no reason, and sometimes babies cry for a reason that you just can't figure out. Unfortunately, knowing that doesn't make it any easier to look into a hysterical child's eyes.

Lefty Rag

By: Mr. Wilson on April 24, 2007
Just because it's a popular topic right now, I want to point out two "the Journal Star is biased" letters in today's LJS letters to the editor. The first complains about the Journal Star's coverage of the LYPG mayoral debate, which Eric Lemke thinks focused too much on Chris Beutler. The second complains about coverage of a Nebraskans Against the Death Penalty poll that showed that 51% of Nebraskans favor repeal of the death penalty. I'll be honest: I used to get uppity about the Journal Star's biases. These days, I just can't work up enough indignation to care. In part it's because my politics have changed. (Before you ask: no, my politics don't neatly line up with the LJS.) But more importantly, it's because I disagree with sentiments like this, from Mr. Lemke (first letter above):
Being a news organization, your duty is to deliver news to the public that is unbiased and forms no opinion.
That simply isn't true. That may be the case for news paid for by our tax dollars (hello PBS!). However, a private company's only duty is to make money for its shareholders, and the company's employees' only duty is to be true to themselves and their values. Besides, objectivity is relative. One man's objective analysis is another man's hyper-partisan screed. Few stories can be told in a way that is free of the author's passions and biases. So what? In the Journal Star's case, it doesn't seem to me that any of their reporters or columnists are going out of their way to hide who they are. None of this is to say that Lincolnites shouldn't get fired up about the Journal Star if they really want to. If you don't like the way the LJS swings and you want them to change, by all means, demand change. It's your duty as a consumer. (There's that word duty again.) I would, however, like to see folks drop the implication that the Journal Star's motives are somehow sinister. The "Journal Star" has no motives beyond the collective motives of its employees, and its individual employees' motives are no more sinister than "I want to finish this damn article so I can go home and watch 'The Office'". To think that the LJS as an entity has a single motive requires assigning it a level of sophistication it does not have.
‹ First  < 198 199 200 201 202 >  Last ›