If you like reading press releases, the Journal Star published a
lightly-edited press release from the folks at
No2Arena this morning that outlines the group's three primary reasons for encouraging you to vote "No" on the arena. They are:
- We're only voting on $25 million out of a $344 million project;
- Environmental clean-up will cost more than the $7.5 million budgeted;
- There won't be many new jobs created.
I have raised questions about all three of these issues before. I'm not worried about the money issue. The City has been pretty transparent about its numbers. It's not like arena backers are going around saying things like "At $25 million, the arena is a bargain! Vote yes!". Everybody knows or should know by now that this is a big, 300+ million project.
As for item number two, I can only say: show me the data. Until they can do that, the No2Arena folks can stick this item in their little no-holes. The City has a relatively large amount of data to back up its claim that the clean-up will cost no more than $7.5 million. Perhaps it's not enough data to satisfy everyone. That's fine. The No2Arena folks on the other hand bring nothing but denials to the table. That's lazy and lame. They are welcome to make this claim when they have something to back it up.
Last is the jobs issue. I
commented at length on the topic back in January. In short they are correct. The long-term job situation isn't going to be dramatically improved by the presence of a new arena. Improved, yes, but we're talking on the order of tens rather than hundreds. The arena isn't the only piece in the puzzle, however. It is a catalyst, and if it does its job it should spur growth in the overall economic engine of the city. To the extent it does that there
will be new jobs created. You'll have to ask an economist how many, but I wouldn't be terribly surprised if that number creeps into the hundreds over time. That's just an instinct, not a promise.
In other arena news, folks who don't like Deena Winter's negative attitude toward the arena aren't going to like
today's column. She has given anti-arena folks a new arrow for their quiver. What she
says is that the City's property tax levy millage limit is 50 cents per $100, and that the City currently taxes at half that rate. What anti-arena folks will take away is "City property taxes will double unless you vote No on the arena!". That's going to be a powerful message for the antis that the pros will have a difficult time overcoming.