Virtual Blight

By: Mr. Wilson on October 25, 2005
In case you missed it, the City Council voted unanimously yesterday to declare 1,800 acres of land in north Lincoln blighted. It's really just a financing trick, so it's not nearly as big of a deal as the messier Samurai Sam's and 48th & O blight designation boondoggles. And yet, I'm concerned. I see a pattern of behavior where Lincoln is tossing around blight designations rather flippantly. Need we fear a slippery slope, I wonder? Consider:
  • In The Grand case, the City used a blight designation to help buy out property owners who were willing to sell anyway. The move kept Douglas Theater Company's costs down significantly.
  • In the so-called Samurai Sam's case, a developer said "I want that land." The City said "OK, here you go!" Public outcry halted the property theft, but just barely.
  • At 48th & O, the City has a general redevelopment plan in mind. Rather than build upon the success of the businesses already there, the City wants to bulldoze the entire area and start from scratch.
  • All of West O has been declared blighted (opening the door to land-takings and other shenanigans), when the City really means merely to encourage investment and development in the area.
  • And now a huge swath of mostly-empty land in north Lincoln has been declared blighted.
Does blight actually have any meaning any more? Is a blight designation becoming an unnecessary show of force the City will use in less and less appropriate situations?

Comments

See what your friends and neighbors have to say about this.

No comments yet! Be the first.

Share your thoughts with the community.

Commenting is no longer permitted on this post.