Lincolnite

Is $2.7 million for 130 acres of linear parkland along the South Beltway worth it? That's $20,769 per acre, or about $.48 per square foot. I'm torn on this one. On the one hand I like parks -- who doesn't like parks? -- and I enjoy it when major roads are softened by green space rather than miles of strip development. On the other hand, $2.7 million for little more than a strip of weeds (the money doesn't include development costs) seems a bit pricey, especially in the context of Lincoln's overall economic picture. Lincolnites are being asked to fork over a hefty chunk of change these days: $250M for schools, $250M+ for the Antelope Valley Project, and on and on. Jerry Hoffman, president of the Nebraska Trails Foundation, notes that the bond would only cost the owner of a $100,000 home approximately $1.60 per year. That argument works in a vacuum, but it degrades quickly when you begin to add up all of the "insignificant" costs we're already saddled with. Not only am I not sure how I will vote on this issue, I really don't have a good feel for how Lincolnites as a whole will tend to vote. Are they willing to put up with another "insignificant" cost now in order to benefit from gains they won't see for at least a decade? Or did the LPS bond issue zap much of their generosity? I'm looking forward to listening in on conversations over the next few weeks.

I am a strong proponent of nuclear power as the best overall source of energy available. It's clean, it's cheap, it's sustainable. Surely Hell hath frozen over, for now even the founder of Greenpeace agrees with me:

Nuclear energy is the only large-scale, cost-effective energy source that can reduce these emissions while continuing to satisfy a growing demand for power. And these days it can do so safely.

I have been against the three-way OPS split since I first heard about it. Problem is, I'm not sure why. Most of my opposition has been purely reflexive. But that's sloppy. Reflexive opinions are fine in limited cases where a quick decision is necessary, whereas for deeper, longer term problems, reflexive opinions are not especially useful. So I've thought about the OPS division a fair bit these past few days. And you know what? I still don't get it. I can't understand why such a big chunk of the Unicameral thought it was a great idea. I'm missing something, some big, important detail. But what? Some say that smaller districts are better. Perhaps that's true. But why is it the state's job, rather than the local residents' responsibility, to determine how big is too big? Senator Ernie Chambers had the gumption to point out the elephant in the room by bringing race into play. He says black people should be in charge of black people, whites in charge of whites, and so on. But then why not a boys district, a girls district, and a "confused" district? Or districts for the smart kids, the average kids, and the special needs kids? The jocks, the geeks, and the artsies? Surely somebody can explain this to me. If that somebody is you, have at it. Even better if you can explain the implications the three-way split has for Lincoln.

Even though I started my taxes back in February, I just wrapped them up last night. The Missus and I are owed a little from the feds, and we owe a little to the state. Add in the cost of Turbo Tax and we basically broke even. A big refund would have been nice in a way, but this outcome makes me even more pleased. It means that, despite the complexities added to our tax return by my various side jobs, we managed to play the tax game pretty well. This year's taxes may be confusing as heck if we end up wrapping up our adoption this year. Adoptions add a layer of ifs, ands, and buts that I'm not sure I'm ready for. Not to mention all of the other financial considerations to think about. Oh well, that's a worry I'm more than happy to worry about.

Five things to do this weekend in Lincoln:

1. Wake up early and take care of spring yard clean-up and garden prep.
2. Attend the Spring Game.
3. Take a walk to Coyote Point at the Pioneers Park Nature Center.
4. Invite some friends over and play Lincoln On Board on the patio.
5. Grab an ice cream cone from Ivanna Cone.

We're hosting a small Passover seder at 625 Elm Street tonight for a few family and friends. It has become an annual tradition at our house, to the point where my family members ask about it every spring. We keep it pretty low-key and informal -- we use our own homemade haggadah, for example -- mainly because in any given year there are only 1 or 2 Jews at the table. We have a good time and enjoy the food. (Except for the maror. Ick.) As I mentioned, we use our own haggadah. We keep things pretty short, but we don't keep them this short! (Click on the intro page to start the animation. There is sound, so have your speakers ready.) If you have never attended a seder, it's worth trying sometime. If nothing else, go for the matzo ball soup and wine. There are always community seders which non-Jewish guests are welcome (and encouraged) to attend.

A white district, a brown district, and a black district. It's an entire rainbow of fun up in Omaha. I just can't get over it: a race-based, Ernie Chambers-endorsed school district resegregation plan just flew through the Unicameral. Bizarro. As long as we're dividing school districts, let's do Lincoln. How would you divide up Lincoln into three screwed up districts (not necessarily by race)? I think my (extremely rough) plan would look like:

1. Everything north of 'O' Street and west of 70th Street
2. Everything south of Old Cheney Road plus everything east of 84th Street
3. All the rest

As much as I think Dave Hergert is a putz, I don't think his impeachment is appropriate. As Matthew Hansen points out, the debate seems to focus more on moral conceptions of right and wrong than on the legality of the vote. While it is fine for the public to offer up simple arguments like "what he did is just plain wrong and therefore he should be kicked out of office", I'm bothered that our state senators are using the same rhetoric. When politicians start using "it's just wrong" as a justification for their actions, somebody (or a group of somebodies) is going to get screwed. It's easy not to get fired up about these indiscretions when the involved party is somebody like Mr. Hergert. I don't know if Mr. Hergert is really the villain he has been portrayed to be, but the guy really hasn't done much to exonerate himself in the eyes of Nebraskans. He could really use some PR training. But not getting fired up is, in the eyes of the politicians involved, the practical equivalent of supporting their actions. I support their disdain for Mr. Hergert, and I agree with the tongue-lashing Mr. Hergert has received from the Legislature. But his impeachment -- which went against the best legal advice of nearly everybody the Unicameral consulted -- I do not condone. Long story short, the Unicameral has voted to waste taxpayer resources to engage in what in all likelihood will turn out to be a quixotic and short-lived adventure through the courts. Will our senators' quest to prove their moral superiority prove worthwhile? Doubtful, especially when one considers all of the time and energy they could have put into more productive pursuits. Dave Hergert's impeachment will benefit no one and punish at most one person. Is that a cost-benefit ratio you're willing to support?

I reffed a soccer game out in Grand Island last night. Mid-way through the second half I suspended the game due to lightning off to the south. It was a difficult decision to make because on the one hand the lightning was putting on a heck of a show, but on the other hand my usual rule of thumb -- the 30/30 rule -- had not yet kicked in. There was no thunder at all, so determining the lightning's distance was pretty much impossible. Eventually my partners and I decided that because the wind was blowing so hard perpindicular to the storm, it may have been carrying the lightning's sound away with it. (I know that's not exactly how sound works, but you know what I mean.) We halted the game, cleared the field, and sat around for 30 minutes. As so often happens in these situations, the lightning bolt that convinced us to stop the game was also the last bolt we saw. Darn it, we could have kept playing. Then I saw the front page of this morning's Journal Star: Teenage girl killed by lightning in Beatrice

A friend of mine is looking to come to town and take his parents to the Husker baseball game against Texas A&M on Thursday evening. Anybody know where he can get three tickets? E-mail me at mrwilson at lincolnite dot com or leave a comment if you can help him out.

Two notes about advertisements in the Nebraska governor's race:

• Tom Osborne has a new radio ad campaign going right now. One of the ads asks, "How often have you had the chance to vote for someone you felt like you really knew, someone you watched for more than 30 years?" I told myself early on that if Osborne pandered to Husker fans with shameless "vote for me because I was a good coach" pleas he'd get knocked down a few notches in my book. Consider him knocked down.
• I heard a Dave Heineman ad on Z-92 this morning. It was the (or a) "Good for Dave Heineman" ad. Whoever is responsible for that thing should be kicked in the shins. Does the Heineman campaign really expect anybody to take that ad seriously? I've heard parodies that weren't that tacky.

In other news, I caught just a couple minutes of David Kramer on Z-92. He probably made some friends (or at least soothed some enemies) with his appearance. The guy sounded pretty good on the radio. Very senatorial.

This isn't directly a Lincoln issue, but I'm putting it here anyway. Nebraskans enjoy complaining about taxes, and a common complaint is that Nebraskans pay more in taxes than do residents in other states. The Census says that's only half right: Nebraska is 24th in per capita taxes, at $2,158.36. In other words, we're not too far from average. Whether or not we get a decent bang for our buck is a whooooole other issue.

The Lincoln Fire Department needs help because many of its promises failed to materialize after it took over ambulance service in 2001.

The city-run ambulance service lost nearly half a million dollars last year, owes about $1.5 million to the city and has requested a $250,000 city subsidy this year. The ambulance service has been run by the Lincoln Fire Department since 2001, after voters were convinced [the fire department] could deliver the service faster, better and cheaper.

Did you hear that deafening roar just now? That was the plan's critics hollering a simultaneous "I told you so!"

Gas prices have been creeping upwards over the past week or so. I'm pegging the peak price of the cheap stuff this summer at $3.75. Anybody else care to take a guess?